Click
Below |
| |
About
Us |
| We
have a long experience of developing reliable competition engines
for rally race sprint and hillclimb applications. Use vour experience
for your next engine.
|
| Contact
Us |
To
receive further details on any of the products listed here
or if you have a specialised custom requirement please phone
or e-mail us on
Tel:
01952 727267
E-Mail
john@raceenginedesign.co.uk
|
|
 |
Latest Development |
the
Manic Beattie Hillclimb Car |
|
The
Latest unit of interest is the MANIC BEATTIE, an extremely innovative
4 wheel drive CLUBMANS type chassis designed by NIC MANN of the
famous ROVER V8 TURBO MOGGY fame. We designed a special 1700 BDT
unit with special cylinder head, bronze gas sealing rings and
other trick bits, to produce at the moment around 400bhp.This
unit is blown with an HELICOPTER TURBINE, which is mounted in
the car and uses it’s own fuel system to produce boost which remains
at a constant pressure at all times, is then fed into the BDT,
permanent boost! NO LAG. This unit was mapped on our dyno using
a RACE TECH DEVELOPMENTS ecu with a 6 layer mapping facility with
fantastic results.
We
had to knock a 12 inch diameter hole in the wall to get the exhaust
out of the cell. As the exhausts on turbines are critical, restriction
is bad news and so we ran the engine with no exhaust, it sounded
like a 747 was flying over the workshop for two days!
NIC has just broken the 20 year old unlimited sports car record
at SHELSLEY WALSH with a 26.43 second run. |
|
THE
sport of speed hillclimbing is one of man and machine against the
clock. That never-ending desire to save the odd hundredth of a second
can often become a life long obsession. To the driver, it is all
about optimum starts,perfect lines and higher corner exit speeds.
To the engineer, it means more power, better traction, improved
chassis balance and long hours in the workshop in pursuit of the
dream. Nic Mann’s quest for that one, perfect run dates back
to the mid-1970s. Having just graduated from Aston University with
an engineering degree and found work at Rolls Royce aero engines
in Bristol, he took up sprinting. The car he used was his mother’s
Morris Minor 1000, complete with 948 cc ‘A’ Series engine.
Over a period of 15 years this was progressively modified. At one
point it featured a turbocharged B series unit and, eventually,
a turbocharged and intercooled Rover V8 with nitrous injection giving
something in the region of 550 bhp.
To cope with the increased power the vehicle initially had a Ford
live rear axle and, finally, a Jaguar XJ6 rear driveline.“Throughout
this period it was fully road legal and was driven to and from meetings
with the racing wheels and tyres strapped to the roof!” recalls
Mann. In 1990, having reached a plateau in the car’s engineering
development, together with the arrival of a new family, the car
was sold to drag racer Bill Sherratt. It still competes in that
category today. |
|
|
So
what does a seasoned hillclimber do when he has a budget of £10,000
just sitting there in his pocket? Obvious – he embarks on
a new project!
“Since the Morris had over the years been something of a crowd
pleaser, its replacement couldn’t be something ordinary,”
says Mann. “Yet even in 1990 £10K wouldn’t get
you very much of a competition car. “Analysis of the competition
showed that successful cars were compact. With the opportunity for
aerodynamic downforce limited because of the low average speeds,
mechanical grip had to be maximised. Soft suspension (to cope with
the uneven surfaces), large wings and the ability to maximise downforce
from the underbody were also required. With two-wheel drive, the
weight distribution would be heavily biased towards the rear, resulting
in large weight variations on the front wheels during transient
power changes and issues with handling and stability.” The
successful cars had F1-derived power units but their power delivery
was thought to be ‘peaky’, making car control even trickier
in the confined width of a typical venue. The critical key features
of any new design would therefore need to be: Maximise mechanical
grip, which effectively meant four-wheel drive and low unsprung
weight (with inboard brakes). Minimum weight and polar moment of
inertia within the constraints of cost. Major components grouped
around the centre of the vehicle and small diameter tyres. The latter
also minimises the size and weight of the final drive transmission
hardware. Minimise the effects of lateral weight transfer, while
retaining a compact package. A low centre of gravity was considered
essential while front/rear static weight distribution was targeted
at 50:50. At 1G acceleration, the targeted centre of gravity should
give a 1/3:2/3, front-rear weight distribution. Chassis construction
technique had to be suitable for low cost home build consisting
of a steel spaceframe chassis with separate bodywork. Eventually
he concluded: “Careful consideration of all these factors
pointed towards a layout with the engine in front of the driver
and a ‘sports car’, Mallock type body with a four-wheel
drive system based on a proprietary 4x4 transmission. Use of a flat
floor allowed the hardware to be mounted as low as possible, with
downforce generated primarily from the large wings allowed in the
sport rather than from the underbody surface.” At this stage
of the design process one could be forgiven for thinking that this
was just a routine design and build exercise. However, it is in
the power train where much of the real technical novelty resides.
With the additional drag of the transfer gearbox and the forward
drive system, not to mention the additional weight, Mann reckoned
on needing at least 600 bhp on tap to generate the record-breaking
performance he was looking for. Expensive F1-style ‘V’
engines were out of the question, not just on cost but because packaging
in front of the driver would have been impossible. |
|
Eventually
help in the form of respected engine tuner John Beattie came to
hand with the arrival of a 1700 cc Cosworth BDT. Canted over at
only 25 degrees to the horizontal towards the intake side, this
satisfied the requirement of minimum centre of gravity and minimised
the frontal area and yet still left room for the driveline forward.
“With 400 bhp the initial aim, it was evident that a move
to a larger turbocharger and quite a large amount of boost would
be necessary,” says Mann. “This would result in the
dreaded turbocharger lag and while anti-lag or ‘bang-bang’
systems were considered, it was quickly decided to move to a much
more radical solution.” Mann’s background in aerospace
led him to a solution involving a helicopter gas turbine APU or
auxiliary power unit. Supplied by Turbine Technologies Ltd of
Carmarthenshire in South Wales, the unit is based on a helicopter
emergency air start unit used to fire the main gas turbine engine
on the ground.
Running
separately from the main engine, initially on diesel fuel, the
unit delivers air to the engine at a constant pressure independent
of the main engine speed and hence totally eliminates the throttle
lag normally associated with high boost turbocharged systems.
Currently set at a very “modest” 25 psi gauge boost,
the engine delivers something in the region of the initial target
of 400 bhp at 7500 rpm. The torque curve is particularly impressive:
from 2500-7500 rpm this doesn’t vary by more than 20% from
the peak value. It is transmitted to the gearbox by a somewhat
elderly AP Racing 7.25-inch triple plate, sintered clutch hidden
within the radically modified Ford bellhousing. From the outset
the car was designed around a Ford Sierra 4x4 MT75 gearbox, which
at the second-hand going rate of about £300 each fitted
nicely with the budget. However, as Mann was to find out later,
this has been a major stumbling block to development.
With no finance to fund a dog gear conversion, he has resorted
to removing the synchromesh cones to speed up changing gear. “Ratios
are standard Sierra 4x4 with second gear giving 60 mph, third
gear 90 mph and fourth 130 mph,”he says. “Fifth gear
has been removed along with reverse, again to save weight. First
gear is used only for tyre warming, starting for the timed runs
being conducted in second gear.”With such a limited budget,
it made sense to use not only the gearbox but as much of the other
Ford Sierra 4x4 parts as possible, including the transfer box.
Using the standard epicyclic transfer gear train and viscous coupling,
drive to the front goes under the heavily-canted engine and up
to the Lotus Elan-derived differential housing before cascading
out either side, through the inboard ventilated disc brake arrangement
and out to the modified Golf GTi Mk 2 front uprights. The brake
discs, being inboard, are limited in diameter to 260 mm because
of ground clearance considerations but with AP Racing 4 pot calipers,
retardation isn’t an issue. At the rear, drive is much like
the front with yet another 3.9:1 Elanbased diff, complete with
limited slip differential, feeding the drive through a pair of
Ralt RT32 rear uprights acquired during the protracted 10-year
build. With all these shafts whirling around and the requirement
to mount extra differentials and turbocharger units etc, Mann
has erred very much on the side of safety and fabricated the spaceframe
chassis out of predominately 11/8-inch by 18 swg (1.22 mm) CDS
tubing. Although the car has never been weighed properly, all
up weight is estimated at “a rather heavy 650 kg,”
Mann wistfully reports, with the target 50:50 front-rear static
weight distribution.
|
|
| There
is scope to significantly reduce weight by rationalising gas turbine
and fuel system parts as well as those in the transmission but
only when funds allow. Perhaps the biggest effort required in
any home-build project is that of producing the bodywork. Always
a compromise between effort required, weight and cost, the temptation
is either to give up totally and hand it over to a professional
or invest your own time in the tedious task of making a body buck,
taking a female impression of this and then making the actual
body out of carbon fibre/GRP. Wishing to eschew both options and
using clear engineering logic, Mann’s answer was to make
the front and upper bodywork out of sheet aluminium while the
sidepods, incorporating the cooling system on one side and the
turbocharger and oil tank on the other, were made out of 3 mm
birch plywood. Carpenter Mann explains: “Although I was
limited to 2D curves, the panels are bonded together using pinewood
strips and coated with several layers of epoxy resin before being
finished with a 2-pack polyurethane paint system. The resulting
finish is exceptional with only a slight weight penalty over the
more normal GRP arrangement.”
Starting
the engine(s), as you might expect, is not that simple and is
somewhat reminiscent of starting a helicopter. Since the turbocharger
oil feed and scavenge system are operated off the main engine,
this needs to be running first. Next in the strict sequence of
events, the auxiliary gas turbine turbo unit needs to be started
using compressed air from the off-board starter unit. At 1 psi
boost with the turbo spinning at 10,000 rpm, ignition and fuel
(initially diesel fuel held in a separate tank) can be switched
on. At 5 psi the system is self-sustaining and the starter unit
can be disconnected. At 13 psi with the turbine spinning at 40,000
rpm and the main engine at idle, the system is ready to go. Tyre
burnouts are conducted at 13 psi boost in first gear but timed
runs, for 2005 at least, used the higher 25 psi boost limit, manually
selected from the dashboard Not surprisingly, there have been
issues. “Control of the turbine was initially a problem,”
he remembers, “with the unit flaming out upon changing gear
and losing boost.”
The latest problems are more serious and potentially more expensive
to fix. Out of the car’s first four meetings – one
of which was the Shelsley Walsh Centenary event at which it lowered
the hill record for Shelsley Specials by a magnificent half a
second – two gearboxes failed. Each time the offending part
was third gear on the MT75 gearbox when for the first time during
a run the transmission experienced the full engine torque. Examination
of those recognisable parts remaining suggested simple low cycle
fatigue. In other words, the box is not strong enough! The winter
rebuild was focused on improving the strength of the gearbox and
reducing the inertia of the driveline. The weight of the propshafts
(both front and rear) has been substantially reduced by replacing
them with TORQline – carbon fibre wound – versions
from the Crompton Technology Group. Support in the form of a 51/2”
aluminium triple plate clutch has come from Tony Tewson at Superclutch,
while a lightweight flywheel and starter motor were supplied by
Ark Racing.
After tests conducted towards the end of last year, further weight
has been saved by dispensing with the diesel fuel tank and running
the turbine on gasoline fuel from the main tank. Along with the
adoption of a lighter battery, the car now weighs 25 kg less.
The major issue of the gearbox, however, has yet to be resolved.
“The original plan was to graft the much stronger Borg Warner
T5 gearbox complete with a Glebe Transmissions dog clutch conversion
to the existing 4x4 transmission,” says Mann. “Unfortunately,
since space is very tight, this wasn’t possible. “Plan
B is to fit the T5 gears into the existing 4x4 Sierra casing.
Rated at around 450 lbs ft (610 Nm), this should give me enough
reserve to increase the boost pressure a little towards the 43
psi maximum – but maybe not this year!” While Mann
has completed all the design work and manufactured the new gear
linkage, he awaits the new gear parts with relish as the season
gets ever closer. With a little extra finance from Aldon Automotive,
the target is the Gurston Down event at the end of May. Fingers
crossed.
|
|